In the land of political drama, New York City seems to have outdone itself, yet again, by throwing the latest character into the spotlight. Enter Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic candidate whose stance on Israel and Palestine has ruffled more feathers than a duck in a pillow fight. Apparently, Mamdani has been quite popular with the radical left for his audacious support – or at least acceptance – of some eyebrow-raising chants relating to the “globalized intifada.” Yes, you heard that right, he’s gained attention for not condemning a phrase that sends shivers down the spine of many a moderate Democrat—or anyone with a shred of political sense.

Despite facing a barrage of questions from reporters and politicians alike, Mamdani has belatedly decided to distance himself from the controversial slogan. Some might call this a noble change of heart, but one suspects that it’s more of a political necessity than a genuine epiphany. After all, trying to win endorsements from Democratic stalwarts like Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer with such explosive baggage is likely to be as successful as selling ice to the Eskimos.

So far, Mamdani’s efforts have left him endorsement-less among the party’s central figures. Neither Jeffries, Schumer, nor Governor Kathy Hochul have backed him, which could be a sign they remember there’s still a red line for Democrats that doesn’t need to be crossed. Or perhaps they’re just eyeing Mamdani’s support base—a pandemonium of radical leftists—with a healthy sense of skepticism that’s inconvenient for their mainstream aspirations.

Meanwhile, as Mamdani scrambles to tidy up his controversial mess, it’s been speculated that his lack of full condemnation might lead some of his more zealous supporters to cry betrayal. Feeding the beast of radical support then attempting to tame it has historically been a fool’s errand. But if he does, in some miracle of moderation, manage to align with the broader Democratic message, it remains to be seen whether the party can swallow its pride and throw weight behind him.

In the background of this unfolding municipal melodrama, two independent candidates and a Republican are in the mix, which could make Mamdani’s road to becoming mayor a scenic route through political wilderness. Strategy sessions must be as intense as war councils at this point, with everyone trying to figure out how to unite and conquer, least Mamdani orchestrates an upset. As the drama unfolds, one can only hope that the voters of New York City demand more than empty slogans and aim for a leader who prioritizes realistic and inclusive policies.