In the far corner of political absurdity, Kamala Harris has unveiled her latest act—a brand-new persona equipped with a colorful vocabulary that rivals a sailor on leave. This Vice President and recently involved political contender has decided to spice up her rhetoric, hoping that a sprinkle of profanity might just be the ticket to revive her waning popularity. After all, when traditional politics aren’t getting the votes, why not drop a few F-bombs to show you’ve got that “it” energy?

In the latest episode of “What Will Kamala Do Next?”, Harris has taken to casual swearing, marking her transition into what some might call, albeit far-fetched, a badass phase. It appears that the book she’s promoting carries this very energy, aiming to connect with the masses in a refreshingly brash manner. The expectation is that her sudden penchant for profanity will relate to the average Joe, who she imagines hurls similar words when stuck in traffic. However, this strategy seems more like trying to sell ice to an Eskimo—confusing and unnecessary.

Now, Harris is also playing the high road regarding Donald Trump and his, as she puts it, “big hammer.” Never mind her previous fixation on such matters, she’s now focused on presenting herself as the voice of serious issues. She criticizes Trump for focusing on irrelevant grandeur while glossing over more pressing crises, such as the looming expiry of SNAP benefits. However, the opportunistic shift leaves one wondering if the sudden moral high ground is genuine or just another performance to fit what seems marketable.

Harris’s newfound approach seems less about policy and more about rebranding; it’s mystifying to see how a few strategically placed expletives are supposed to qualify someone as relatable and genuine. Behind this façade, one could argue, lies the same old politics—just dressed differently. It’s amusing to witness how easily someone’s narrative can shift from career-focused motivations, some might say opportunistic ones, to feigned indifference to matters they previously deemed crucial.

While it’s all entertaining to watch her dance across the political stage with unpredictable moves, winning voters’ trust requires more than a dazzling footwork and sleight of hand with words. Perhaps instead of trying to keep up with changing trends, Harris should focus on building genuine connections based on clear policies and honest intentions. For now, though, it’s more like watching a reboot of a reality TV show where the plot’s twist is just another PR gimmick. Here’s hoping her next act comes with a better script.