Charlie Kirk recently debated vegan activists on college campuses, sparking heated discussions about diet, health, and ethics. His arguments leaned heavily on conservative values like personal responsibility, human exceptionalism, and skepticism of government overreach. Meanwhile, the vegan side focused on animal rights and environmental concerns.

Kirk insisted meat consumption is vital for human health, particularly for boosting testosterone levels in men. He dismissed plant-based alternatives as “synthetic fake meat” pushed by figures like Bill Gates, framing them as threats to traditional American values. While acknowledging animals shouldn’t be mistreated, he argued humans have a biblical mandate to prioritize their own flourishing over animal welfare.

Opponents claimed animals like cows and pigs suffer just as much as unborn children, calling it hypocritical to ban abortion while supporting factory farming. They cited World Health Organization guidelines declaring vegan diets healthy for all ages. Kirk shot back, saying comparing animals to humans ignores the unique reasoning capacity and souls of people.

Amid this debate, Kirk promoted the – a drug-free approach emphasizing metabolic health and lifestyle changes over calorie counting. The program claims a 94% success rate, with clients like Tim N. losing 133 pounds and reversing chronic health issues. Unlike trendy diets or weight-loss medications, it focuses on reducing “food noise” and cravings through customized nutrition plans.

This debate underscores broader cultural divides. Kirk’s stance aligns with conservative priorities: defending individual freedom (like eating steak), rejecting top-down dietary mandates, and trusting free-market solutions over government subsidies. The PhD program’s natural, self-driven approach mirrors these values, positioning itself as a patriot-friendly alternative to woke “diet culture.”