In a political theater that can sometimes rival the plots of Hollywood blockbusters, a reporter for Newsmax found himself at the center of the drama during the Biden administration. James Rosen, a seasoned journalist with over two decades of experience, has been quite vocal about the price he paid for asking tough questions about President Biden’s cognitive health. This saga took a new turn recently, as he reflected on his journey and the challenges he faced in trying to get straight answers from an administration that often appeared evasive.
Rosen stated he was essentially “blackballed” by the Biden White House for eight months after having the audacity to ask a straightforward question. Yes, if anyone thought this was a walk in the park, think again! Instead of being met with open dialogue, Rosen was shut out from the press briefing room, like a kid left out of a game of dodgeball. The Biden administration, under both Jen Psaki and her successor Karine Jean-Pierre, made it clear that they didn’t appreciate his inquiries about the president’s declining mental state—which many Americans noted and questioned.
To make matters juicier, the backlash wasn’t just from the White House. Legacy media outlets jumped at the chance to call out Rosen, branding his questions as disgraceful and sensationalist. Rosen reflected on how, in an era when revelations about the president’s health were whispering under the surface, he was left feeling like an outcast while others in the press glossed over an issue that many found concerning. How odd it is that a question about the leader’s mental fitness can spark such outrage, while so many others stayed silent!
As the Biden presidency trudged along, the story didn’t end with Rosen’s exclusion. He consistently pointed out the glaring signs of cognitive decline that seemed to be overlooked for far too long, even keeping a mental note of how few in the press dared to tackle the topic throughout the years. His persistence is commendable because it sheds light on a fundamental element of journalism—the need to ask hard questions, especially when the public deserves transparency from its leaders.
Rosen believes that the coming years will unveil even more details about Biden’s presidency, especially with memoirs and disclosures expected about his time in office. It sounds like the makings of a gripping political drama is in the works! As readers of political stories, many folks are itching for the juicy details from insiders who could potentially expose the administration’s inner workings. What will we discover about who was really making the decisions behind the scenes? And can we trust that the Biden Presidential Library will have all the classified matters in check?
As the dust settles on this chapter of the Biden administration, Rosen plans to pen a book about the “complicit media” that followed the narrative laid out by the administration, refusing to challenge it. It’s a wonder how a country founded on freedom of speech and the press can experience such contentious dynamics when it comes to holding power accountable. In the meantime, Americans are left wanting answers, a fact that could lead to a significant reckoning within the press corps as it recalls the importance of asking the tough questions—no matter how uncomfortable they may be.
