A fiery debate erupted as a college Catholic student challenged Charlie Kirk to defend his tough stance on immigration during a recent campus event. The student pushed for more open borders, but Kirk fired back with blunt arguments about overcrowding, social services, and protecting American jobs. California’s hospitals, schools, and roads are strained, Kirk argued, demanding a “pause” to let the state “digest” recent immigration waves before welcoming more people.
Kirk warned that unchecked immigration threatens cultural cohesion and the American dream. “My parents came legally with zero dollars and built lives here,” he said. “But when you import millions who don’t share our values, you risk losing what makes this nation great.” He stressed that immigration exists to benefit the homeland, not replace its people.
The student’s pro-immigration arguments clashed with Kirk’s focus on enforcing legal borders. “Economic growth isn’t the only metric,” Kirk declared. “We’re one nation under God, not GDP. Mass immigration depresses wages, floods schools, and burdens taxpayers. corporations benefit, but working-class Americans suffer.” He rejected the idea that “trinkets” and globalist policies outweigh national unity.
Kirk turned to scripture, citing the biblical book of Nehemiah to defend border walls. “God didn’t smile on chaos,” he said. “Building walls isn’t about hate—it’s about protecting what’s sacred. If someone breaks into your home, they’re a criminal. The same applies to nations.” He accused critics of “cherry-picking” verses while ignoring lawful borders.
The debate exposed deep divides on illegal immigration. Kirk condemned “20 million uninvited guests” and the dangers of cartels, sex trafficking, and stolen identities. “This isn’t compassion—it’s lawlessness,” he said. “We can’t save the world, but we must protect our own.” He demanded stricter enforcement and a return to merit-based legal immigration.
Kirk also clashed with the student over birthright citizenship. “You’re here illegally, but you’re staying because of a misinterpreted law,” he said. “And I’m the bad guy? We need rule of law, not double standards.” He called for ending policies that reward violating immigration rules.
The exchange highlighted conservative frustrations about open-borders activists. “They ignore the struggles of American families,” Kirk said. “They care more about globalist dreams than working-class livelihoods. We can’t afford to be the world’s welcome mat.” He urged voters to support leaders who put citizens first.
As the debate ended, Kirk left no doubt about his stance: “Our nation isn’t a humanitarian experiment—it’s a sovereign country with borders, laws, and a Creed. Stand strong, patriots.” His message resonated with supporters who see illegal immigration as a threat to America’s future.
