As often happens when someone closely connected to President Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda begins making effective changes, the media quickly find a target. This time, the focus is on Stephen Miller, President Trump’s point person on immigration policy. Apparently, if a person supports the objectives of the Trump administration, it’s only a matter of time before they’re put in the crosshairs by the same outlets that pushed the Russia collusion narrative. Now, NBC seems intent on driving a wedge between Trump and one of his most loyal supporters by scrutinizing Miller’s efforts to protect the nation’s borders.
Stephen Miller, no stranger to criticism, has been part of Trump’s team from day one. His firm stance on border enforcement and immigration control is no surprise to those who have followed his career. Since Trump’s inauguration, Miller has held significant influence over immigration policy as both Deputy Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Adviser. His latest endeavor, pushing for increased ICE arrests, aims to maintain President Trump’s promise to the American people. Apparently, this strikes some media outlets as controversial. But in reality, fulfilling campaign promises seems like governance as usual, unless, of course, you’re expecting politicians not to keep their promises.
NBC seems particularly ruffled by Miller’s expectation that ICE agents should aim for 3,000 arrests per day and expedite deportations. Critics suggest this number is high, but some argue it’s too low, considering the influx of illegal immigrants over the past few years. By some estimates, during the Biden administration alone, a significant number of illegal immigrants entered the country. The media’s reluctance to acknowledge such numbers is amusingly predictable, given their tendency to turn a blind eye when reality doesn’t fit their narrative.
Despite the furor, the truth remains that Americans largely support robust immigration enforcement, including deportations for those in the country illegally. Miller’s approach aims to enforce existing laws, a principle one might assume would sit well with any law-abiding citizen. But, ironically, enforcing laws becomes controversial when it involves certain policies. Americans want to see businesses held accountable for hiring illegal workers and want these jobs reserved for citizens. Imagine that—wanting jobs to go to those legally entitled to work.
Interestingly, while the media spins its wheels over Miller’s objectives, other reports highlight significant drops in border crossings and illegal releases. Perhaps rather than criticize those enforcing the law, more energy should be spent addressing underlying issues and finding solutions that align with public sentiment. It seems reasonable to suggest that politicians and media influencers step out of the studio and onto the streets to gauge real-world perspectives. But then again, why deal with reality when a narrative is so much more fun to sell?
