Charlie Kirk Takes on Pro-Choice Claims with Fiery Logic

In today’s complex social landscape, an essential and contentious issue is the question of when human life begins and, subsequently, when it deserves protection under the law. This topic is not just a matter of personal belief but a crucial moral and ethical issue that speaks to the core values of society. The recent exchange between two individuals highlighted how convoluted viewpoints can muddle the fundamental principles of life and human rights.

The argument put forth that human life only becomes worthy of protection when an individual can communicate verbally is troubling. Such a stance undermines the inherent value of life and raises grave ethical questions. If society were to adopt this reasoning, it would imply that infants, who cannot yet speak, do not have the right to life—an idea which is not only irrational but dangerous.

From a traditional standpoint, human life is considered to begin at conception. This belief is rooted in the understanding that, from this point onward, the development of a unique individual starts, complete with distinct DNA. Denying this fact and moving the goalposts to a point where a child can speak fails to recognize the continuity and growth of human life from its earliest stages. It ignores the reality that an unborn child’s dependency doesn’t differ morally from that of a newborn, who relies entirely on caregivers for survival.

Moreover, the idea that post-birth life can be terminated based on a changed decision by the parents is both unethical and contrary to the laws that protect against the harm and neglect of minors. The legal system rightly punishes any act of violence against infants, as it recognizes their vulnerability and the duty of society to defend them. It is a disturbing notion that some might challenge this evident truth.

In essence, this debate should remind us all of the simple, yet profound, responsibility to care for and protect human life in all its forms. As society wrestles with complex moral dilemmas, it’s imperative to maintain clarity on certain foundational principles. The value of human life should never be contingent upon arbitrary milestones like the ability to speak. It is a right that is bestowed at the moment life begins and should be protected as such. Maintaining this stance is not only consistent with common sense but is vital to preserving the principles of justice and compassion upon which society is built.

Picture of Keith Jacobs

Keith Jacobs

Leave a Reply



Recent Posts

Trump Supporters: Get Your 2020 'Keep America Great' Shirts Now!

Are you a proud supporter of President Donald Trump?

If so, you’ll want to grab your 2020 re-election shirt now and be the first on your block to show your support for Trump 2020!

These shirts are going fast so click here to check for availability in your area!

-> CHECK AVAILABILITY HERE


More Popular Stuff for Trump Supporters!

MUST SEE: Full Color Trump Presidential Coin (limited!)

Hilarious Pro Trump 'You are Fake News' Tee Shirt!

[Exclusive] Get Your HUGE Trump 2020 Yard or House Flag!

<