In what seems like an unsurprising twist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, known widely as AOC, is catching some heat for her questionable actions surrounding the infamous Met Gala. The representative for New York’s 14th congressional district, who is often hailed by some as a fighter against the billionaires, is ironically embroiled in controversy over an event synonymous with opulence. It appears that the congresswoman, who donned a bold dress with the provocative message “Tax the Rich,” did not bother to pay for the dress herself. This fashion faux pas has not exactly painted her as the champion of the people she purports to be.
The Met Gala, known as a playground for the rich and famous, comes with tickets costing a mere $35,000—chump change for your typical millionaire. AOC took her fiancé along, who also enjoyed a complimentary pass. The free Disneyland-style admission to the Gala for AOC’s partner has raised some eyebrows, given the clear rules about accepting such lavish gifts as a public servant. It’s a case of, “Do as I say, not as I do,” and now Congress is less than amused, launching an investigation into this colorful soirée.
One could argue that karma has delivered a reality check to someone who enjoys hobnobbing with the A-list crowd while simultaneously rallying against them. Observers couldn’t help but note the irony of AOC’s inclination towards high-end brands, even as she portrays herself as the face of grassroots socialism. It’s a tale as old as time: the self-styled warrior for the working class enjoying life in the lap of luxury. Maybe it’s time to rethink the notion of the so-called “socialist fashionista.”
In sharp contrast, former President Donald Trump never shied away from showcasing his wealth. His unapologetic Americanism—think helicopter rides at the fair—was a world away from the lipstick-laden cover-ups of socialist elites. Trump was known for his generosity, often bestowing hefty tips on those who worked around him. Such gestures are a far cry from AOC’s reported stiffing of a makeup artist to the tune of over $400. The makeup artist reportedly had to contemplate legal counsel before finally getting paid by AOC—after all, it seems it takes more than just a catchy slogan to uphold integrity.
This ordeal serves as a mirror reflecting the contradictions within the political class that boasts concern for the average citizen yet indulges in perks meant for the top one percent. It underscores a fundamental flaw in the socialist narrative. While it’s fashionable to attend glittering galas, the sheen tends to fade when the bill comes due. AOC’s district deserves more than just catchy phrases on borrowed dresses. Maybe it’s time for more than a dress to change—how about a change of habits?
