In a world where accusations fly faster than the latest gossip in the schoolyard, Stephen Miller has some strong words regarding Robert De Niro and the heated debate around immigration enforcement. According to Miller, De Niro has not exactly been a box-office golden boy in recent years, and this is why his sudden political outbursts might be making more noise than the films he’s been involved with. Whether or not people want to give De Niro’s opinions the same attention as his famous roles is a question worth pondering.

But beyond De Niro’s qualms, the real story is about the increasingly fierce debate over immigration and the work of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. Stephen Miller is adamant that the radical left is launching what he sees as an unconscionable attack, not just on federal law enforcement but on the very Constitution itself. It seems like the narrative here is not just about policies but about what some see as a full-blown assault on American principles. According to Miller, if support for law enforcement is considered controversial, then something’s gone off the rails.

The dialogue becomes more concerning when discussing the creation of tracking apps. Allegedly designed to give criminals a heads up on ICE’s whereabouts, these apps are painting a worrying picture. Imagine trying to do a job and finding your every move broadcast for all to see—including those who might want to make your job a lot tougher or even downright dangerous. Countless ICE officers supposedly find themselves at increased risk due to these technological ambushes, and one wonders how this is justified.

Then there’s Governor Pritzker and his so-called crusade to oust ICE from areas needing their presence most. As Miller tells it, this seems like a perfectly reasonable way to allow criminals more freedom to continue their activities, which few would agree is a prudent course of action. There’s a real concern for public safety, with these debates highlighting the differences in priorities between parties and the risks involved in turning a blind eye to illegal activities taking place across the country.

Finally, Miller draws attention to the tragic stories of loss of life involving illegal immigrants, suggesting these instances are the natural, albeit unfortunate, results of the current administration’s policies. With individuals who have lengthy arrest records for serious crimes being released into communities, it’s clear why many feel this debate is far from over. The question, as posed by Miller and many concerned citizens alike, remains: how much more has to go wrong before meaningful change is enacted? Such are the conundrums facing America today, with the safety of law-abiding citizens hanging in the balance.