As the diplomatic rodeo swirls on the global stage, Secretary Rubio and Special Envoy Witoff landed in Geneva to finesse a supposed 28-point peace plan aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe. This grand itinerary, designed with nods from both the Russian and Ukrainian sides, has now been reduced to a couple of vague sticking points. All the while, the president sits in a corner, beaming with hope like a kid on Christmas Eve, seemingly convinced that this carefully crafted piece of peace pie might actually end the turmoil.

The president claims to be channeling the frustrations of the American people. Yes, the same folks who were thrilled when President Trump pulled the plug on war funding, effectively halting a steady cash flow to the conflict. Meanwhile, the arms shipments to NATO partners are still chugging along, because who doesn’t like a good sale, right? Part of the president’s optimism seems to stem from a vision that involves the United States stopping both the fighting and the check-writing, proving that he’s a president yearning for peace—or at least a good deal.

Now, let’s peel back the layers of this intricate ballet of diplomacy conducted by our boundary-pushing peace-seekers. They’ve managed to comb through this festooned plan, crammed with nearly 30 points. Who knew peace required a checklist longer than a kid’s wish list to Santa? It’s supposedly a masterstroke of peace-time strategy, meticulously debated and fine-tuned over cups of Swiss coffee. Yet here we are, left with just a few points in dispute. And like any great dramatic work, those few pivotal points might just hold the kingdom of peace—or at least a truce—in balance.

The administration is striving for accolades, eagerly reminding everyone about their endless hours of war-ending efforts. But as history tutors often remind us, intentions are something, and actions quite another. While the leaders debate the final few points like pieces on a game board, the urgency remains to slay the dragon of conflict that’s devoured enough lives and resources already. The standoff resembles a timeless tale of backstage diplomacy—where actions, rather than speeches, are needed to usher in the peace that the president so visibly craves.

So, here we are as observers of this gripping saga, cheerfully leaning on our opinions and skepticism. The weight of anticipation hangs like a heavy curtain as governments manipulate the strings of diplomacy. The world watches, partly hopeful yet predominantly wary of the pendulum’s next swing. Peace, after all, remains a complicated endeavor requiring not just paperwork, but real-world acts that break through the rhetoric. Until then, we wait, brochure in hand, for the curtain call of Secretary Rubio, Special Envoy Witoff, and a plan meant to cradle peace in its most practical embodiment.