Ah, the political theater never fails to entertain, especially when it involves Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Over the weekend, New York’s most famous (or infamous, depending on who you ask) representative found herself in the spotlight at the Munich Security Conference. No stranger to controversy, AOC attempted to share her thoughts on the global stage. But, as JD Vance quipped, it turned out to be what he called the most uncomfortable TV moment he’d ever witnessed. Ouch! The question on everyone’s mind: Does AOC really have the chops to discuss international policy, or is she just reciting catchphrases handed to her like an eighth-grader with a book report?

Now, it’s no secret that AOC is more at home on social media, where her sharp retorts and huge follower count make for an online following frenzy. But here’s a reality check—impressing folks with clever tweets is worlds apart from winning over voters with well-informed positions on serious global issues. Critics are lining up to suggest that AOC’s flashy online presence doesn’t exactly translate to having the gravitas needed for a seat in the Oval Office or even a solid grasp on complex international affairs.

Of course, AOC insists her appearance in Munich wasn’t about some covert campaign for the presidency or any higher office, much to the skepticism of many. She claims her agenda is different and more purpose-driven. But what purpose, exactly? To reaffirm her role as a lightning rod for conservative criticism? Or maybe to provide plenty of comedic material for commentators? The world may never know—or care, as Kaylee McGee White points out. One can’t help but wonder if this was indeed a premature, if not flat, trial balloon for 2028.

And just for kicks, some media outlets have compared AOC to none other than Franklin D. Roosevelt, suggesting she embodies the working-class economic populism essential for Democrats’ success and democracy’s defense. Really now? Let’s get real—AOC managing a Great Depression or global conflict as FDR did seems as improbable as snow in July. This desperate need for a modern-day Democrat to hang their hopes on brings back memories of previous overblown expectations placed on candidates who never quite lived up to the hype.

In the midst of this spectacle, VP hopefuls and seasoned Republicans like JD Vance are seizing the moment. They’re reminding voters of the stark choice at hand: the track record of those in power versus the promises of the past. With the midterms and the next big election season in sight, the Republican message frames a broader question: Do voters want to return to the policies of yesteryears, or stick with the momentum of progress charted under recent Republican leadership? With inflation descending and other key metrics on an upswing, the GOP argues the choice is clear, casting doubt on the future Democrats envision. It’s a tale of two perspectives, and AOC’s role in this saga provides both sides ample fodder to rally their respective bases.