In the latest whirlwind of political drama, it seems Ilhan Omar has found herself in the eye of the storm yet again. This time, a tweet of hers sparked a frenzy, suggesting that the U.S. was poised to attack Iran right smack dab in the middle of Ramadan. Not exactly the type of tweet that evokes thoughts of peaceful international relations.

Naturally, eyebrows are shooting up all over the place. Could it be that Omar had access to some insider information? After all, she’s a sitting member of Congress. It’s not unreasonable to think she might have a few ears in high places. But then again, keeping secrets seems about as easy as herding cats in political circles. Just ask the Gang of Eight, a select group well-acquainted with top-level security briefings. They’ve had their fair share of juicy tidbits, like the one ahead of the latest State of the Union. With Omar’s close buddy in the ranks, Representative Hakeem Jeffries, it’s enough to make you go, “Hmm.”

Watching Omar during the State of the Union, however, was like a scene from a political soap opera. She seemed less than pleased, to put it mildly, and let it show in her vocal opposition to President Trump. For someone who came to the U.S. as a child refugee—a country her ancestors never had to sweat to build—her outrage rubbed many the wrong way. The irony of using a platform given by the freedoms of this very nation to denounce its president isn’t lost on anyone.

But let’s not stop there. Omar’s past statements and actions around terrorism have stirred the pot numerous times. She’s been known to call for more leniency in cases involving ISIS members and once referred to the 9/11 attacks with the cryptic phrase, “some people did something.” Words matter, folks, especially when it comes to topics as sensitive as national security and terrorism. It’s actions like these that make some question her loyalty, and whether it borders too close to home for terrorists, rather than home soil.

Now, everyone’s favorite question: did Omar commit treason? It’s something that’s echoing in conservative circles like a never-ending game of telephone. The U.S. code contains provisions for denaturalizing individuals based on terrorist affiliations, which puts Omar’s controversial comments under a microscope. It’s a question that leaves conservatives scratching their heads and cringing at her perceived naivety—or worse, the danger of her possibly insightful assumptions. Regardless of where you stand, the debate over Omar’s actions is bound to keep the political stage abuzz, proving once again that in the world of politics, there’s never a dull moment.