In the latest twist in global affairs, the media landscape seems to have flipped on its head—or maybe it’s just another Tuesday. Amidst the chaos in Iran, a curious game is afoot: the legacy media, alongside some left-wing pundits, appear more interested in scoring political points against former President Trump than in acknowledging the geopolitical reality unfolding before their eyes. One can’t help but wonder if Trump Derangement Syndrome has indeed reached new, dizzying heights.

It’s an odd spectacle, to say the least. Even as Iran’s military crumbles—thanks in part to strategic airstrikes from American and Israeli forces—certain outlets seem intent on championing Iran’s so-called resolve. While ABC frames Iran’s military as exhibiting resilience, one might question if there’s a parallel universe in which “decimated” translates to “thriving.” Meanwhile, other media darlings like Time magazine ponder if Trump’s actions will somehow radicalize the regime further. News flash: Radicalization seems to already be Iran’s brand.

CNN, not one to sit out such an affair, offered a list of reasons why triumph has supposedly eluded Trump in Iran. This, despite reports indicating substantial military successes. It raises the question: are they watching the same news feed, or is it all just another episode of “Narratives Gone Wild”? One almost pities the logic here before quickly remembering that sensational journalism has long since replaced objective reporting in some quarters.

Then there’s The New York Times. Ever keen to stir the pot, they sound the alarm bells over an inevitable oil shock, seemingly aghast at economic tremors that, if they recall, were also seen under the careful watch of one Joe Biden. High gas prices certainly didn’t seem to cause much panic then, at least not in reporting circles. But now, with the tables somewhat turned, the sky is apparently falling.

While media outlets dither over semantics, the reality on the ground speaks for itself—a regime teetering on the brink, with its so-called Supreme Leader nowhere to be seen. As experts have noted, this is more than just a military confrontation; it’s a test of resolve and strategy. Trump’s approach, some argue, is more akin to Churchill’s wartime decisiveness than to anything seen in recent decades. It emphasizes strength and intelligence over prolonged engagements—hardly the stuff of headlines ESPN might produce.

And yet, the persistent narrative from some corners remains that Trump is the real problem, while somehow glossing over the antics of a regime notorious for horrendous human rights violations. You have to hand it to these creative minds defying logic: if Olympic gymnastics awarded medals for narrative twisting, the legacy media might just be on the podium.