In a world where tradition and family values are constantly under siege by the relentless march of modern progressive ideologies, one story stands out for its sheer audacity. A country music singer, who happens to be gay, is at the center of a cultural debate that has conservatives shaking their heads in disbelief. This singer has taken the concept of parenthood and transformed it into a media spectacle, using a surrogate child as fodder for his online content. This troubling scenario is a prime example of how society’s norms are being twisted beyond recognition.

Surrogacy, which once served as a last-resort option for married couples struggling with infertility, has now been co-opted by the far left. It has become a tool that allows individuals to partake in the joys of parenthood without the traditional trappings and responsibilities that come with it. For some, it’s a radical statement, but for many conservatives, it’s an alarming trend – a blatant commercialization of childbearing that should be debated, if not outright banned.

Now, some may dismiss these concerns as being outdated or prejudiced, likening conservatives to relics from the past. They’re quick to criticize us as though we’re stuck in the “dark ages” of the 1990s, but what they fail to recognize is the wisdom in those conservative perspectives. Twenty years ago, the positions conservatives held on family, marriage, and the responsibilities entailed were not fringe but foundational to societal stability. These ideas, once scoffed at by the progressive elites, have proven time and again to possess enduring significance.

Interestingly, there is backlash even from those who claim they’ve moved away from liberal ideologies. Many of these individuals, after having publicly renounced their liberal leanings, arrive at the conservative dialogue only to insist we adopt their lesser version of conservatism. They criticize us for not embracing their newly formed views on topics like gay surrogacy, suggesting that opposing such practices makes conservatives retrogressive. To them, the notion of maintaining family-centric values in a world that sees no lines dividing right from wrong is perplexing.

At the heart of the matter is a question of consistency and conviction. If one’s political journey brings them to the doorstep of conservatism, it’s imperative they embrace its core principles wholeheartedly, rather than selectively. For those who have recently left the liberal fold, perhaps it’s time to rethink their own foundational beliefs before scolding those who have consistently stood for traditional family values. The call is simple: reaffirm what it means to be conservative and preserve the societal structure that has supported generations before us. That’s not backward thinking. It’s clarity.