Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered a powerful rebuke of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s stance on birthright citizenship. Barrett’s opinion showed Jackson doesn’t understand centuries of legal tradition. The Supreme Court made the right call to limit judges who overreach their power.

Barrett wrote the majority opinion in a 6-3 ruling about presidential authority. This decision let President Trump’s order on birthright citizenship move forward. It stopped activist judges from blocking the president’s actions across the whole country.

Jackson wrote a fiery dissent that made wild claims about the ruling. She said it would destroy America’s government and lead to “our collective demise.” Her words sounded like fearmongering rather than legal reasoning.

Barrett shot back hard at Jackson’s arguments. She called Jackson’s dissent “startling” and “not tethered to any doctrine.” Barrett said Jackson ignored over 200 years of court decisions and the Constitution itself. That’s embarrassing for any justice.

The facts were clear: Jackson’s opinion made no sense legally. Barrett proved Jackson skipped basic constitutional principles. This showed Jackson cares more about politics than the law.

Later, Jackson tried defending her extreme views in public. She called the court’s decision an “existential threat.” But those are just empty words to hide her weak legal arguments.

Conservatives know Barrett stood strong for the Constitution. She protected presidential powers from judges who think they rule America. That’s how our Founders designed the system.

This case proves we need justices who respect law and order. Barrett showed real backbone defending America’s foundations against liberal attacks. We must protect our institutions from such dangerous ideas.