In a world where logic sometimes seems as elusive as a glimpse of Bigfoot, the decision by countries like the UK, Australia, and Canada to recognize a state of Palestine may have reached new heights of absurdity. These nations are choosing to support a political entity with no defined borders, government structure, or even a remote sense of responsibility for its own people. All of this while a terrorist organization, Hamas, plays host in the region, holding hostages like some deranged game of “Monopoly” where human lives are at stake.
As the world seems keen on handing out participation trophies to entities with questionable motives, the United States stands firm with moral clarity under President Trump’s administration. It’s as if some global leaders believe peace can be achieved by awarding recognition to an entity that, presently, resembles more of a theoretical construct than an actual state. Engaging in diplomatic gymnastics, they appear to be tiptoeing around our straightforward American stance, which asserts that only through military pressure—or perhaps even victory—can genuine peace be forged.
This state of affairs seems fittingly mirrored in the memorial service for the late Charlie Kirk, whose impact on American politics and the GOP was substantial. The conservative community rallied in Arizona, remembering him not just as an influential leader and thinker, but as a pivotal figure in the Republican strategy credited with helping shape the election landscape. Evidently, certain individuals from the left appear more concerned with canceling late-night comedians than mourning the loss of someone who fervently advocated for free speech and open dialogue.
Interestingly, the American political scene is more comparable to a roller coaster ride than a stable democracy these days. While mourning Kirk’s passing, Congress found itself embroiled in a debate over a resolution to honor his contributions. The resolution, though intended to unite, only showcased division as a majority of Democrats balked at supporting the measure. One can’t help but wonder if time travel were possible, perhaps some on the left might even think twice before aligning with American values that once united the nation in simpler times.
Perhaps most astonishingly, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, ever the beacon of restraint and reason, criticized the memorial proceedings, claiming the administration was using Kirk’s death as an opportunity for a First Amendment overhaul. Meanwhile, out in the real world, security was so tight it would make a Super Bowl feel like a high school game, as fears of political retribution cast shadows over the memorial. As the country navigates through this turbulent chapter, one lesson from Kirk’s life seems abundantly clear: robust discussion, gentlemanly conduct, and coalition-building are ideals worth remembering and fighting for.
