A climate activist got schooled in basic science during a heated debate this week. Conservative commentator Charlie Kirk exposed glaring gaps in a left-wing environmentalist’s arguments about global warming. The clash shows how radical climate alarmists push fear over facts.

Kirk challenged claims that humans cause most climate change. He pointed out scientists still debate how much people impact temperatures. Solar flares and natural Earth cycles might explain warming better than carbon emissions. This common-sense approach flustered the activist.

The environmentalist struggled to defend claims that climate disaster is inevitable. She couldn’t name specific studies proving humans drive temperature shifts. Kirk calmly noted many experts reject doomsday predictions. Real science requires humility, not blind faith in political narratives.

Woke activists want Americans to ditch cars, meat, and air conditioning to “save the planet.” Kirk warned these policies hurt working families while China keeps polluting. Sacrificing our way of life for unproven theories is reckless and un-American.

The activist accused Kirk of “ignoring science” but failed basic questions. She couldn’t explain how carbon dioxide levels compare to historical norms. Her emotional outbursts revealed more about liberal intolerance than climate facts.

True environmental stewardship balances nature and human progress. Kirk argued innovation — not regulation — solves challenges. Free markets developed cleaner energy faster than government mandates ever could.

This debate proves climate alarmism relies on scare tactics, not solid evidence. Everyday Americans see through the hysteria. They know real solutions come from freedom, not fearmongering.

The left’s climate agenda would bankrupt middle America to please coastal elites. Conservatives must keep fighting for sensible policies that put people first. Our future depends on rejecting radical green extremism.