In the heart of Minnesota, amidst the snowflakes and bustling city life, the city of Minneapolis is embroiled in yet another controversy involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). An ICE agent lies wounded with internal bleeding from an altercation involving a car incident. Now, one would think that the safety of enforcement officers would be a bipartisan priority, but in the land of a certain controversial mayor, Jacob Frey, the priorities seem somewhat skewed.
Mayor Frey, known for his outspoken nature and colorful language, insists that his comment suggesting ICE should exit ‘his’ city was not only justified but remains steadfast today. So here we have it, a mayor standing firmly by his words from last June when the agent was initially harmed during a similar incident. The mayor claims his distrust in federal investigations is the reason for his stance. Apparently, when your city experiences crime, the best solution is to push out those tasked with enforcing the law. It’s a lesson in civic governance that continues to baffle many.
Meanwhile, back in 2016, CNN took a deep dive with ICE, showcasing agents working under the “cloak of darkness” in Chicago. The story presented ICE’s mission as one focused on removing criminals to ensure community safety. It’s curious to note how times and narratives change depending on which political lens is currently in vogue. Is it now unpopular to consider the safety of communities through law enforcement or has the narrative simply shifted to suit different agendas?
Mayor Frey’s city isn’t alone in this supposed enlightenment. As ICE readies itself to be part of the New York City backdrop, complete with the inevitable protests, some might say the Big Apple’s residents should watch closely. If Minneapolis is any indication, New Yorkers should prepare for a front-row seat to a drama of vehement protests wrapped in terms of civil disobedience. Rumor has it there are manuals circulating for protest tactics — should we be surprised?
Putting aside the political theater, one fact remains painfully clear. The ICE agents, like the one recuperating from injury, continue to serve with commendable dedication and bravery. Each day, they put themselves in harm’s way, facing recurring dangers, while certain politicians mock their efforts instead of supporting them. Perhaps it’s time to thank those in uniform who ensure that safety isn’t just a concept reserved for certain social circles but a reality for all citizens. Isn’t it time to appreciate the fundamental services they provide, instead of vilifying them at every turn? As ICE agents pull criminals off the streets, perhaps it’s our duty to pull back the shroud of misunderstanding and acknowledge the facts that ensure our society’s safety.
