In the ever-entertaining world of celebrity politics, Dylan Mulvaney, the famous social media influencer embroiled in controversy over a partnership with Bud Light, has teased a new chapter—one that might involve crossing the pond for good. The announcement stirred quite a bit of chatter among folks who keep a close watch on the cultural and political theatrics that seem to endlessly swirl around certain progressive figures. With the declaration that Dylan may be relocating permanently to Britain, there’s a lot to unpack and chuckle about in the irony-laden saga of brands, backlashes, and international moves.

First things first: Dylan Mulvaney has been dubbed the “grim reaper” of brands, especially following the Bud Light debacle. Aligning with celebrity figures such as Dylan has proven to be as reliable a brand strategy as selling swimsuits in a snowstorm. Bud Light lost a significant chunk of its consumers—about 18% according to a CNBC estimate in May—thanks to a marketing partnership that missed the mark with its core audience. But here’s the twist: despite the apparent marketing flop, some mischievous pundits are pushing for Dylan to become the official face of the Democratic Party, bringing his magical brand touch to progressive politics. What could possibly go wrong?

Now, concerning the move to Britain: Dylan seems to feel right at home with the UK’s more theater-friendly culture and—who can blame them—has developed an affection for the local Percy Pigs candies. One can only wonder whether these sweet treats can make up for missing out on the American snacks like Twinkies and cheeseburgers. Rumor has it that the inclination to move permanently is spurred by a desire to experience the kinder, gentler folks on the other side of the Atlantic. Yet, isn’t it fascinating that although Dylan talks up inclusivity and diversity, the choice of relocation hints at landing in one of the most homogeneous regions? Food for thought, dear readers.

Dylan’s previous travels in search of solace included a stop at Machu Picchu, where they talked about blending solo travel with inner discovery. This round of globe-trotting seemed to be inspired by the need for sanctuary after the Bud Light drama, proving that even viral sensations need a break from the limelight. However, questions buzz around why influencers often select destination escapes among the world’s most homogenized cultures instead of the diverse locales their politics often champion, like perhaps South Africa or the Middle East. It’s these tidy ironies that keep conservative commentators grinning.

Overall, as Dylan toys with the idea of moving their tears to British soils, Americans are left to ponder if this is truly the 21st-century version of Britain reclaiming American colonists. Some are thanking their lucky stars that this self-deportation trend sends these celebrities off to greener, or at least more English pastures. While Dylan packs bags and many Americans wave a courteous goodbye, one can only wait to see if the tears of this influencer make waves across the pond—or if they simply become part of the celebrity drizzle in the UK. Cheers to the quirks of modern fame and the hilarity of political irony!