In a delightful display of self-parody, the Democratic party has offered us another star-in-the-making who seems to have mastered the fumbling rhetoric of controversy. Jasmine Crockett, arguably the latest sensation in political missteps, has found herself in the limelight once again, thanks to a clip that’s been dusted off and brought back into circulation. Once more, an attempt at stirring racial potpourri has transformed into a buffet of confused criticism.

Now, Jasmine apparently has her concerns about Florida Representative Byron Donalds. It seems her remarkable stance against interracial marriages, particularly his, has been a sticking point. One wonders if her perspective is that of a distant time when Jim Crow was anything more than a historical specter. It’s a bit like claiming the earth is flat—or that taxes are fun; both are equally absurd but can still fetch a laugh.

But Crockett doesn’t just stop at griping over marital choices. No, she dives deeper into the nonsensical depths, insinuating that Donalds is somehow less black because of his spouse’s skin color. It’s a witless paradox only a true political sage—or someone needing a quick reality check—could concoct. Let’s face it: that logic is like a screen door on a submarine.

Of course, Crockett isn’t the solitary voice in a cacophony of Democratic discord. Her ideas resonate with a choir that would rather rewrite history to fit an ever-shifting narrative. Ironically, if the tables were turned, and someone from the Republican side had lapsed into such ramblings, the cancel culture brigade would be out in full force. Yet, here we are, shaking our heads as she is lauded, perhaps even applauded, for her “bold” stance.

In the realm of political theatre, these episodes are rich fodder for anyone with a taste for irony. It’s as if she’s some grand master of comedy, unknowingly providing the laughs with every sentence that stumbles, every point that misses its mark. Maybe, just maybe, Jasmine’s next career move should involve writing her autobiography. It could be aptly titled: “How to Lose Friends and Confuse Constituents.” One can only hope she’ll continue her gift of making headlines—for all the wrong reasons.