In a remarkable turn of events, the Department of Justice has received a criminal referral from former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The referral points accusing fingers at high-profile members of the Obama administration, alleging their involvement in concocting what has famously become known as the “Russia collusion hoax.” These claims have been substantiated by a stack of documents released last Friday, which provide persuasive evidence against Obama and his national security squad.
Republicans and other skeptics of the Russia investigation have long been waiting for this moment. Sean Hannity, Mark Meadows, and Jim Jordan were all abuzz over this fresh revelation. They have been emphasizing for years how a select few were intent on revealing the truth while others appeared eager to evade it. Now, it seems the ideological chickens have come home to roost for those who propagated the Russia narrative.
A closer examination of events reveals that different standards were indeed prevalent during the 2016 election cycle. While Donald Trump faced an avalanche of scrutiny, Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information appeared to be met with less investigative fervor. The transcript hints at clandestine meetings involving top intelligence officials like James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey—meetings that were as hush-hush as an undisclosed area 51.
In a scenario that boggles the mind, August 2016 saw meetings in the White House where plots thickened and intentions brewed. And who can forget the infamous Christopher Steele dossier? That document, laced with tales more dramatic than most soap operas, was wielded as a weapon against Trump, even though its credentials were shakier than a two-legged chair. Apparently, the gears of a 10-year-old conspiracy machine were set into motion, aiming not only to derail Trump’s presidential bid but also to undermine his presidency once he took office.
As the political drama unfolds, these sobering truths underscore a vital need for accountability. Those who viewed themselves as the titans of honest journalism and government transparency must now face the music. With these revelations, the importance of a thorough investigation into this alleged conspiracy becomes paramount. It might seem like a page pulled straight out of a political thriller, but for the American public and future generations, the outcome holds significant weight. Hopefully, after all this, the legacy media and those who blurred lines will finally be held accountable, reminding everyone that deception has a short shelf life.
