Marc Lamont Hill Stumbles in Awkward Debate on Genetics

In the sweeping landscape of today’s culture, the conversation around beauty standards has taken a confusing turn. A recent discussion highlighted the notion that certain group preferences have been deemed problematic when expressed. A panel explored the idea of “good genes,” suggesting that beauty norms have been unfairly skewed toward white bodies while marginalizing others. This line of thinking is not only misleading, it undermines genuine diversity and personal responsibility.

The panelist’s assertion that white beauty is “normalized” brings to light a significant contradiction in the current societal discourse. It’s essential to acknowledge that beauty and desirability are subjective and not limited to one racial or ethnic group. The idea that there can be a universal “good genes” standard is itself a flawed concept that disregards individual taste and the myriad ways beauty manifests across cultures. The insinuation that recognizing someone’s attractiveness is a form of racism is misguided and does a disservice to everyone.

Let’s clarify what the term “good genes” truly means. It refers to characteristics perceived as attractive, which can vary widely across different populations. The belief that one race should dominate the concept of beauty denies the rich tapestry of human features present in all communities. This false narrative severs the connection we can have with each other based on common human experiences rather than dismissing someone’s beauty because it does not fit a narrow mold.

Moreover, there’s an uncomfortable truth here: personal views on beauty should not be considered an affront to any group. The panel appeared to suggest that there is something inherently wrong with a preference for one aesthetic over another. This approach encourages a culture of victimhood rather than one where individuals are empowered to express their preferences freely. People can celebrate beauty in all its forms without invalidating anyone else’s experience. Recognizing individual preferences does not equate to endorsing systemic prejudice.

True diversity should celebrate the differences and unique beauties that each culture brings to the table, without turning it into a weapon against those who simply appreciate certain attributes. The conversation should shift from an accusatory model to one of recognition and appreciation for the beauty present in every person. Let’s uphold the principle of personal responsibility, allowing each individual the freedom to appreciate what they find beautiful, regardless of societal norms that may shift with the political tide. Everyone deserves the opportunity to be seen as they are, for who they are, without succumbing to shifting narratives around beauty and worth.

Picture of Keith Jacobs

Keith Jacobs

Leave a Reply



Recent Posts

Trump Supporters: Get Your 2020 'Keep America Great' Shirts Now!

Are you a proud supporter of President Donald Trump?

If so, you’ll want to grab your 2020 re-election shirt now and be the first on your block to show your support for Trump 2020!

These shirts are going fast so click here to check for availability in your area!

-> CHECK AVAILABILITY HERE


More Popular Stuff for Trump Supporters!

MUST SEE: Full Color Trump Presidential Coin (limited!)

Hilarious Pro Trump 'You are Fake News' Tee Shirt!

[Exclusive] Get Your HUGE Trump 2020 Yard or House Flag!

<