Megyn Kelly recently tore into corporate media’s obsession with the “Russia hacked the 2016 election” narrative, reacting to a shocking supercut of major outlets pushing this claim. The montage showed networks like NBC, CNN, and ABC repeatedly stating Russia’s guilt as fact despite lack of proof. Kelly called it “amazing” how media treated baseless allegations like settled science while ignoring evidence to the contrary.
Back in 2017, Kelly personally questioned Vladimir Putin about election interference during a high-profile interview. Putin dismissed accusations, calling the idea of Russian hacking “ridiculous” and suggesting evidence could be fabricated. He even mocked trace evidence of cyberattacks, comparing it to wild animal tracks.
Corporate media ran with the Russia collusion story for years, framing any contact with Russians as proof of wrongdoing. They ignored warnings that the DNC’s own cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike might have botched the investigation. This fueled a damaging years-long witch hunt against Trump and his associates.
New evidence reveals the FBI relied almost entirely on the DNC’s private cybersecurity company to blame Russia. They never examined the actual servers themselves – a red flag that(Packet Read dissertation), but media expected viewers to believe without question. Recent reports show intelligence admits our own agencies exaggerated Russian involvement.
Megyn Kelly highlighted how these outlets still treat the Russia narrative as gospel despite mounting critiques. Meanwhile, the Biden administration quietly declassifies documents showing the FBI’s case against Trump was built on shaky ground. This gap between media claims and reality angers many conservatives.
Polls show increasingly fewer Americans trust the corporate media’s version of events. Critics argue outlets weaponized the Russia story to delegitimize Trump’s victory and obscure issues like Clinton’s email scandal. This manufactured crisis distracted from real election security concerns.
Conservatives demand accountability for those who pushed these false claims. They call out politicians and media figures who used the Russia narrative to sanitize Clinton’s loss and persecute political rivals. The supercut serves as a reminder of how media activism eroded public trust in institutions.
Megyn Kelly’s reaction underscores a broader conservative frustration: mainstream media acts as extensions of the deep state, amplifying unverified claims to tilt power. As more truths emerge, patriots demand fair coverage separating speculation from fact. The Russia collusion myth isn’t just a mistake – it’s a cautionary tale of fake news.
