Once again, Chicago finds itself entangled in a controversy as perplexing as it is contentious. The crux of the matter this time? A “Drag Storytime” event held at a public library for, of all audiences, toddlers. Just when you thought you’d heard it all, critics argue that bringing in a man dressed as a woman to entertain babies pushes a certain woke, sexualized agenda on innocent young minds. The library, however, stands its ground, insisting this is all about fostering inclusion. If you ask the public, it seems many would prefer their kids learn phonics over a flamboyant performance.
Outside the South Side library, emotions ran high as protestors clashed over the event. On one side, those in favor of the event passionately supported the idea of using public spaces to promote diversity and self-expression. On the other, concerned community members voiced the opinion that this event does not align with what their community desires or requires. They had a point when they said their kids require more literacy support rather than a colorful cabaret-cum-story hour.
The library’s administration explained to local media that the event aligned with their vision of promoting early literacy and a sense of belonging through age-appropriate books and interactive discussions. Yet, the presence of a drag queen at a toddler-friendly event raises eyebrows and questions about appropriateness. Some argue that the event, utilizing taxpayer dollars, is veering far from the educational goals set for public institutions. Who knew reading Green Eggs and Ham needed to involve a makeover?
The library’s plans for Pride Month include a slate of similarly inclusive events, like intergenerational queer art-making activities and identity-affirming stations. However, it was the baby-focused events that seemed to really hit a nerve within the community. In a city where educational statistics are often less than stellar, there’s certainly a poignant irony in focusing resources on these gold-star displays of cultural progressiveness over basic literacy strategies.
Sadly, the Chicago Public Library hasn’t publicly responded to concerns or offered any reassurance to communities expressing unease with these events. It’s a bit baffling, really—one might think large public institutions would be eager to maintain public trust and transparency. Instead, they’re moving full steam ahead with storytelling sessions that are, to say the least, a bit novel for the typical ABCs crowd. While some praise the library for sticking to its inclusive guns, others doubt whether such initiatives are what taxpayers had in mind for their school’s most nascent readers.
