Newly unsealed crime-scene photos from the horrendous murders in Moscow, Idaho have re-ignited a firestorm of questions that Americans deserve answered. Veteran reporter Howard Blum joined Megyn Kelly to point out inconsistencies in the official timeline and to argue, plainly and patriotically, that the public has a right to know whether a lone killer or a team of killers terrorized these students.
The images themselves are gruesome and unmistakable: blood-spattered rooms, handprints, and the chaotic aftermath of a slaughter that left four young lives extinguished. Autopsy details and forensic commentary now put the total stab wounds at roughly 150 across the victims, and a defense-hired criminologist has openly suggested the likelihood of multiple attackers after reviewing the wounds and scene.
Blum rightly asks a hard question conservatives have been making since day one — could one man have executed such a brutal, methodical attack across two floors in the narrow window investigators originally offered? He notes timelines of nine to thirteen minutes and the practical limits of a single assailant moving through the house, which is exactly the kind of commonsense scrutiny that law enforcement should welcome.
Equally troubling are reports that DNA from unidentified individuals was found at the scene, and that certain physical evidence did not match what the public expected if one man had done it all. The release and then partial removal of photos by authorities, and a judge’s later order to shield graphic images from public view, underscore how messy and opaque this investigation has been for the families and for the country.
Meanwhile, the man accused in the attack took a plea deal and is now serving consecutive life terms without parole after pleading guilty in July 2025 — a resolution that closed the criminal case but left many questions unanswered for grieving families and suspicious citizens. That plea spared a jury from deciding on the death penalty, but it also may have foreclosed the full airing of evidence that could establish whether others were involved.
Let’s be blunt: conservatives believe in law and order, not in cover-ups. When unexplained DNA, varying accounts from surviving roommates, and the odd behaviors around the arrest — details Blum highlighted — sit alongside a plea deal that silences a defendant’s future testimony, it is reasonable to demand deeper transparency and accountability from prosecutors and investigators. The families deserve nothing less.
If there were accomplices, or if investigative shortcuts left raw questions, the system must confront that reality head-on instead of offering soothing press releases and sealed files. Local and federal authorities owe the victims’ families a full accounting, and patriotic Americans should insist on independent review where the official story leaves holes large enough to hide a conspiracy.
This is about more than one case in one college town; it is about whether our institutions will fight for truth and justice or paper over inconvenient details to close a headline. Conservatives stand with the families, demand answers for the dead, and will not be satisfied until every avenue of inquiry — including the possibility of more than one perpetrator — is thoroughly and transparently exhausted.
