In today’s world, where common sense seems to be a rare commodity, there’s a new trend that’s sweeping through campuses and social media like a bewildering plague: neopronouns. How did society reach a point where seemingly sensible adults are seriously discussing words that look like they were created by a child randomly hitting buttons on a keyboard? These terms, such as “ze” and “xe,” are apparently being used by non-binary and trans individuals as an attempt to better align with their gender identities. They are new creations, without specific historical roots, yet they have become a part of modern discussions on gender identity.
Of course, those who champion this linguistic development claim that using these neopronouns is all about respecting individual identity. The sources emphasize that refusing to use them excludes people. Perhaps academics enjoy spinning such narratives, but it’s clear that this is more about creating spaces for all individual identities rather than a mere fashion statement.
Critics of this neopronoun craze are quick to point out the absurdity of the situation. After all, isn’t it enough to recognize and respect the more traditional pronouns like “he,” “she,” and “they”? These have served society without confusion for generations. Yet now, it seems people are being asked not only to respect how individuals identify themselves but also to mindfully address them in their preferred manner. Critics argue that demanding the use of these terms is an almost tyrannical level of thought control masquerading as progressive inclusivity.
The truth is, no one can control how someone else views themselves. An individual’s self-perception is inherently a personal and private matter. People should be free to see themselves however they wish. But demanding that everyone else adopt these terms represents a linguistic shift in society. However, the lack of understanding or acceptance of these pronouns can indeed impact individuals, as research shows that respecting an individual’s pronouns can reduce suicide rates among transgender youth.
At the end of the day, one has to wonder where this rabbit hole leads. Encouraging the use of neopronouns may sound progressive, but some believe it risks clouding communication with needless complexity. Instead of embracing an expanding dictionary of self-made terms, critics suggest society might be better off focusing on shared values and common sense. Nonetheless, the importance of clarity and respect in language, as well as in thought, should be balanced with the need for inclusivity and understanding, ensuring a society where everyone feels recognized and respected.
