In the turbulent arena of political races, it seems the Democrats have decided that integrity is optional and transparency is just a pesky nuisance. Enter Susan Crawford, the candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The drama began with Crawford attending a briefing linked to Democratic donors, which sparked criticism during the campaign. Some might call this strategic; conservatives might choose another word entirely.

Crawford claims she was merely a tourist on this electronic gathering, blissfully unaware of the true intentions of her fellow participants. It’s a rather convenient story, isn’t it? She appeared briefly, she says, and during her cameo appearance, any mention of Congressional Maps must have somehow slipped under her radar. You have to wonder, did Crawford not peek at her email invite, or was the allure of Democratic dreams too tantalizing to resist? It seems she might have shown up to the wrong play, but stayed to enjoy the show.

Now, let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t the sitcom it sounds like. This isn’t the gentle oopsie of a judge who’s just too trusting. This is the kind of political maneuvering that sends hard-working citizens into a state of eye-rolling disbelief. When someone eyeing a supposedly nonpartisan position finds themselves knee-deep in partisan politicking, it becomes harder to believe they’re capable of putting law above loyalty to their party. The Democrats might call it a slip-up; others might suggest it’s a bit more intentional.

With roughly 95% of Kamala Harris’s supporters backing Crawford, compared to 87% of Trump supporters rallying around the Republican candidate Brad Schimel, the stakes are high. This isn’t just another race; it’s a tapping foot on the tightrope of judicial integrity. If Crawford takes this seat, it might usher in an era where the courtroom becomes yet another stage for partisan politics, playing out not only in Wisconsin but potentially influencing national trends.

For conservatives, the mission becomes clear. In the days leading up to the election, it’s crucial to rouse the base. Apathy shouldn’t win the day. Every voter who believes in safeguarding a truly impartial judiciary needs to stand up and be counted. Losing this race isn’t just about conceding a seat—it’s about losing ground in the battle to maintain a justice system that serves the people, not the parties. It’s time to shake off any complacency and show up for Schimel, ensuring the gavel remains in the hands that respect the letter of the law above all else.