The recent Supreme Court decision about mail-in voting has certainly stirred the pot, especially at the White House. The president’s reaction could be described as, well, less than thrilled. In a lengthy social media post, the president expressed his dissatisfaction, accusing certain justices of being afraid of the Democrats and lacking the courage to preserve what he sees as “our America.” It’s a bold statement, reminiscent of the kind of rhetoric that keeps political debates spicy.

Now, some people are wringing their hands, wondering whether a president should be so openly critical of the Supreme Court. But really, can you expect anything less? As the attorney general pointed out, the president absolutely has the right to voice his opinions about another branch of government. It’s a free country, after all, even when disagreements arise within its leadership. The president’s words might be strong, but they’re consistent with what he’s said all along. It’s almost as if he’s on a mission to remind people that politics isn’t a place for the faint-hearted.

The attorney general’s comments provide a useful perspective. They reminded us all that comparing his previous roles in law to his current public duty is comparing apples to oranges. While some might want him to critique the president’s words like a cautious lawyer advising a client, he clarified that the game is different when you’re in the Oval Office. Democracy is robust enough to withstand a few fiery remarks, even when they come from the highest office in the land.

The president’s conduct isn’t simply about venting frustration. It’s part of a broader narrative about judicial decisions impacting the country’s direction. Whether or not one agrees with the president, it’s true that this discussion is part and parcel of democracy. It’s a reminder that Americans are allowed—nay, encouraged—to question and challenge decisions they disagree with, even when those decisions come from revered institutions.

All in all, whether the Supreme Court has “Let our country down,” as the president lamented, is up for debate. What isn’t debatable is the president’s right to express his views. It’s one of those grand American traditions—like apple pie, baseball, and vigorous political debate. So, as political theater plays out, we can at least appreciate the show for what it is: a vivid demonstration of the interplay between our branches of government.